<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for What about China?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whataboutchina.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk</link>
	<description>Answers to this and other awkward questions about climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:22:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Qu: Cigarettes: the environmental impact&#8230; by Noctine Less</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/08/19/qu-cigarettes-the-environmental-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Noctine Less</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=79#comment-237</guid>
		<description>&quot;And then there is tobacco’s contribution to world hunger. According to Dr Judith MacKay, Director of the Asian Consultancy on Tobacco Control in Hong Kong, tobacco’s “minor” use of land denies 10 to 20 million people of food. &quot;

As much as I would like to see every individual quit ,this to me is the clinching argument for regulating</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And then there is tobacco’s contribution to world hunger. According to Dr Judith MacKay, Director of the Asian Consultancy on Tobacco Control in Hong Kong, tobacco’s “minor” use of land denies 10 to 20 million people of food. &#8221;</p>
<p>As much as I would like to see every individual quit ,this to me is the clinching argument for regulating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qu: Can we make our rubbish into fuel? by Tracey Smith</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/08/29/qu-can-we-make-our-rubbish-into-fuel/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=87#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Evening all - the issue of mining energy from landfill sites, or converting energy from burned waste in hi-tec plants is one that will keep all the bigwigs busy for years.

I&#039;m more concerned with getting everyday folks to see the resource they have under their noses and getting them to convert that into another form of energy - &#039;black gold&#039; or compost that they can grow a few fruits and vegetables in!

Food waste remains an enormous contributor to landfill, despite the best efforts of great campaigns like Love Food Hate Waste and many more.  

Perhaps the energies of the powers that be might be better invested in helping to encourage and convert the general public across to a bit of simple composting.  This could be aided by consistent financial concessions for purchasing bins, with statutory bins built on all new housing developments and serious investment in community allotment schemes to begin with, not to mention getting neighbouring boroughs and councils to share their resources and let more green and food waste in via the doorstep collection schemes.

If people get to grips with a little sustainable living, many of our eco-problems could well be kicked into touch.

Rubbishly yours,
Tracey Smith

Author of The Book of Rubbish Ideas
www.BookOfRubbishIdeas.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evening all &#8211; the issue of mining energy from landfill sites, or converting energy from burned waste in hi-tec plants is one that will keep all the bigwigs busy for years.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more concerned with getting everyday folks to see the resource they have under their noses and getting them to convert that into another form of energy &#8211; &#8216;black gold&#8217; or compost that they can grow a few fruits and vegetables in!</p>
<p>Food waste remains an enormous contributor to landfill, despite the best efforts of great campaigns like Love Food Hate Waste and many more.  </p>
<p>Perhaps the energies of the powers that be might be better invested in helping to encourage and convert the general public across to a bit of simple composting.  This could be aided by consistent financial concessions for purchasing bins, with statutory bins built on all new housing developments and serious investment in community allotment schemes to begin with, not to mention getting neighbouring boroughs and councils to share their resources and let more green and food waste in via the doorstep collection schemes.</p>
<p>If people get to grips with a little sustainable living, many of our eco-problems could well be kicked into touch.</p>
<p>Rubbishly yours,<br />
Tracey Smith</p>
<p>Author of The Book of Rubbish Ideas<br />
<a href="http://www.BookOfRubbishIdeas.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.BookOfRubbishIdeas.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qu: Can we make our rubbish into fuel? by Simon Evill</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/08/29/qu-can-we-make-our-rubbish-into-fuel/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Evill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=87#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Very interesting indeed.

Particularly encouraging as materials in landfill will have an increasing commercial value in the future compared with the price of raw materials, not to mention the environmental benefits, which are numerous. A number of organisations are creeping into this area.

Have a look also at the U.S Army&#039;s &#039;Tactical Biorefinery&#039; http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=978 , which digests organic and non-organic waste into ethanol, methane and propane. Absolutely ingenious!

Very useful for the disaster relief situations, as well as military operations.
Surely this technology can be used commercially to create useable fuels from landfill.

There is also a microwave technology that coverts plastics into oil and rubber tyres into diesel. One such innovator is Global Resource Corporation (GRC), whose &#039;Hawk 10&#039; machine can recover oil and gases from a variety of waste materials, oil sands and shales. However, the cleverest part is that gases produced in the conversion process are used to fuel the machine, in a closed loop system of sustainable energy use. See: http://www.globalresourcecorp.com/

Not sure how this might or might not affect the advancement of renewables?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting indeed.</p>
<p>Particularly encouraging as materials in landfill will have an increasing commercial value in the future compared with the price of raw materials, not to mention the environmental benefits, which are numerous. A number of organisations are creeping into this area.</p>
<p>Have a look also at the U.S Army&#8217;s &#8216;Tactical Biorefinery&#8217; <a href="http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=978" rel="nofollow">http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=978</a> , which digests organic and non-organic waste into ethanol, methane and propane. Absolutely ingenious!</p>
<p>Very useful for the disaster relief situations, as well as military operations.<br />
Surely this technology can be used commercially to create useable fuels from landfill.</p>
<p>There is also a microwave technology that coverts plastics into oil and rubber tyres into diesel. One such innovator is Global Resource Corporation (GRC), whose &#8216;Hawk 10&#8242; machine can recover oil and gases from a variety of waste materials, oil sands and shales. However, the cleverest part is that gases produced in the conversion process are used to fuel the machine, in a closed loop system of sustainable energy use. See: <a href="http://www.globalresourcecorp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalresourcecorp.com/</a></p>
<p>Not sure how this might or might not affect the advancement of renewables?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qu: Are energy-saving bulbs the brightest idea? by Bethan</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/08/01/qu-are-energy-saving-bulbs-the-brightest-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=71#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil, 

Thanks for your comment. It goes to show how important it is for large  businesses to prioritise environmental policy, especially when it comes to being transparent in &#039;greening&#039; their supply chain. I&#039;ve heard a similar story to the &#039;Chinese Ikea lightbulbs&#039;; this time the business is Sky, who, in their new campaign to be CarbonNeutral, have sparked a race for optimum energy efficiency between manufacturers of digi boxes. 

Suppliers will go the extra mile to improve their environmental credentials when winning business is at stake; a realistic and slightly depressing fact that should be a cue for to the government and consumers alike to put pressure on market leaders. 

Bethan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil, </p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. It goes to show how important it is for large  businesses to prioritise environmental policy, especially when it comes to being transparent in &#8216;greening&#8217; their supply chain. I&#8217;ve heard a similar story to the &#8216;Chinese Ikea lightbulbs&#8217;; this time the business is Sky, who, in their new campaign to be CarbonNeutral, have sparked a race for optimum energy efficiency between manufacturers of digi boxes. </p>
<p>Suppliers will go the extra mile to improve their environmental credentials when winning business is at stake; a realistic and slightly depressing fact that should be a cue for to the government and consumers alike to put pressure on market leaders. </p>
<p>Bethan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Question: are patio heaters evil? by Wainenry</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/06/26/question-are-patio-heaters-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Wainenry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=65#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qu: Are energy-saving bulbs the brightest idea? by Neil</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/08/01/qu-are-energy-saving-bulbs-the-brightest-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 08:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=71#comment-38</guid>
		<description>We can try to save energy by using low-energy light bulbs. Presently
these are based on a technology that uses mercury. Traditional forecasting or planning would attempt to establish whether the energy savings are more substantial than the disadvantage of dispersing more mercury. The real answer is that it is usually not possible to answer these kinds of questions with any degree of certainty.
Ikea used The Natural Step planning methodology in developing their low-energy bulbs. As a result, they found a supplier in China that used a third as much mercury as other suppliers. The other suppliers were duly notified about the reasons for choosing Chinese low-energy bulbs. It is obvious what the effect of this announcement was, not least its virtual guarantee that funding would be put into new research. Tomorrow’s alternatives, heading towards no mercury, are under development.
 the key to the whole thing is the closed technical loop idea of the recycling program put in place by Ikea. Without that it isn&#039;t much of a step in the right direction towards sustainability. The systematic increase of mercury in natural systems is a serious problem but by looking to reduce the amount used in production and then eventually substitute it for something else along with a recycling system is a great step over the old bulbs.
thx
Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can try to save energy by using low-energy light bulbs. Presently<br />
these are based on a technology that uses mercury. Traditional forecasting or planning would attempt to establish whether the energy savings are more substantial than the disadvantage of dispersing more mercury. The real answer is that it is usually not possible to answer these kinds of questions with any degree of certainty.<br />
Ikea used The Natural Step planning methodology in developing their low-energy bulbs. As a result, they found a supplier in China that used a third as much mercury as other suppliers. The other suppliers were duly notified about the reasons for choosing Chinese low-energy bulbs. It is obvious what the effect of this announcement was, not least its virtual guarantee that funding would be put into new research. Tomorrow’s alternatives, heading towards no mercury, are under development.<br />
 the key to the whole thing is the closed technical loop idea of the recycling program put in place by Ikea. Without that it isn&#8217;t much of a step in the right direction towards sustainability. The systematic increase of mercury in natural systems is a serious problem but by looking to reduce the amount used in production and then eventually substitute it for something else along with a recycling system is a great step over the old bulbs.<br />
thx<br />
Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Question: What About China?!? by Bethan</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/05/27/54/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=54#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hi Derrick, 

Thanks for your comments. You&#039;re right to point out that focusing on other countries contributions to global warming is no reason to ignore our own. So, well done for getting your solar water heater installed. Solar PV panels are pricey but there are grants available and with the cost of energy rising at such a rate your investment will pay off a lot quicker. 

Check out these websites for more information about grants and installation. 

http://www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk/home/
http://www.heatmyhome.co.uk/uk-solar-grants.htm
http://www.government-grants.co.uk/solar-water-heating-grants.shtml 

Good luck! 
Bethan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Derrick, </p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. You&#8217;re right to point out that focusing on other countries contributions to global warming is no reason to ignore our own. So, well done for getting your solar water heater installed. Solar PV panels are pricey but there are grants available and with the cost of energy rising at such a rate your investment will pay off a lot quicker. </p>
<p>Check out these websites for more information about grants and installation. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk/home/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk/home/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.heatmyhome.co.uk/uk-solar-grants.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.heatmyhome.co.uk/uk-solar-grants.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.government-grants.co.uk/solar-water-heating-grants.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.government-grants.co.uk/solar-water-heating-grants.shtml</a> </p>
<p>Good luck!<br />
Bethan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qu: What about population increase? by Toby</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/07/04/qu-what-about-population-increase/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=66#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Jonathan Porritt touches on this issue in his &#039;Population&#039; piece (http://www.jonathonporritt.com/pages/2008/06/population.html) on his blog, suggesting that population growth is on of THE issues we have to tackle, ahead - perhaps - of HIV/AIDS. Worth a read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Porritt touches on this issue in his &#8216;Population&#8217; piece (<a href="http://www.jonathonporritt.com/pages/2008/06/population.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jonathonporritt.com/pages/2008/06/population.html</a>) on his blog, suggesting that population growth is on of THE issues we have to tackle, ahead &#8211; perhaps &#8211; of HIV/AIDS. Worth a read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Question: What About China?!? by Derrick Bloch</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/05/27/54/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Bloch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=54#comment-25</guid>
		<description>It makes life a whole lot easier for oneself if one can point to someone else&#039;s smokestacks!!

From my own point of view I try to make my opwn little contribution, and find that frustrating too. We recently installled a solar water heater on our roof. I have been looking into Solar Voltaic panels as well, but for a little guy like me it becomes frighteningly expensive, and takes a serious chunk out of the household budget.

In my opinion governments, both local and federal, should be doing two things: (i) heavily subsidizing the installation of solar energy technology and making it affordable for homeowners and (ii) hammering the message home to kids in school, because they are the ones who change the parents&#039; opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes life a whole lot easier for oneself if one can point to someone else&#8217;s smokestacks!!</p>
<p>From my own point of view I try to make my opwn little contribution, and find that frustrating too. We recently installled a solar water heater on our roof. I have been looking into Solar Voltaic panels as well, but for a little guy like me it becomes frighteningly expensive, and takes a serious chunk out of the household budget.</p>
<p>In my opinion governments, both local and federal, should be doing two things: (i) heavily subsidizing the installation of solar energy technology and making it affordable for homeowners and (ii) hammering the message home to kids in school, because they are the ones who change the parents&#8217; opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organic meat: a climate hazard? by baby</title>
		<link>http://whataboutchina.co.uk/2008/05/16/organic-meat-a-climate-hazard/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whataboutchina.co.uk/?p=39#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Nice website!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice website!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
